SC Rules President's Remission Power Final, Dismisses Death Plea
SC Rules President's Remission Power Final, Dismisses Death Plea

The Supreme Court of Pakistan has ruled that the President's constitutional power to remit or reduce a convict's sentence is final and irrevocable, holding that any subsequent enhancement of that sentence must be supported by a clear and explicit legal basis. In this regard, the SC dismissed an appeal seeking its directions to convert the life imprisonment of a convict Tahreen Ilyas into the death penalty, noting that the convict had already completed his sentence and been released.

Hearing Details and Jail Superintendent's Testimony

During the hearing, the Superintendent of Jail, Zhob, Balochistan, appeared before the court via video link. The bench questioned him about the report stating that the convict had served 14 years in prison before being granted remission of the remaining sentence under a presidential general remission. The court asked under which law a 14-year period had been treated as sufficient for a life convict.

The bench observed that, to its knowledge, Supreme Court precedents require a life convict to undergo at least 17 years of imprisonment. However, since the convict had already been released, the court said the legal question would be examined in another appropriate case.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Legal Questions Raised by the Bench

The court also questioned how a second punishment could be imposed under Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code after the original sentence had already been executed. It observed that the trial court had convicted the accused for murder, the sentence had been implemented, and any attempt to enhance the punishment now required a strong legal justification.

The bench further remarked that the Constitution empowers the President to remit or reduce sentences and that this constitutional authority had already been exercised in the present case. It observed that if the law were to permit enhancement of a sentence after such remission, it would require a constitutional amendment, adding in a light-hearted remark that constitutional amendments are not exactly difficult these days.

Appeal Dismissed

The Supreme Court subsequently dismissed the appeal seeking to enhance Tahreen Ilyas's sentence from life imprisonment to death.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration